Remission granted to the petitioner in one such sentence, the benefit of such remission would not be ipso facto extended to the other sentence.
Complaint U/s 354(A) of IPC is counter blast against the Petitioner, FIR liable to Quashed.
Order of premature retirement can be passed on forming opinion that it is in the public interest to retire a government servant compulsorily and it has to be passed on the subjective satisfaction of the government.
Accused given Triple Talaq through Whatsapp Message before filing of FIR, quashing the FIR is declined.
At the stage of framing the charge, the Court is not required to hold elaborate enquiry, only prima facie case is to be seen.
The defence of the accused is not to be looked into at the stage when the accused seeks to be dischagred under Section 227 Cr.P.C.
In the event of an accidental death of a pillion rider of a vehicle, being a gratuitous passenger, the Insurance Company would not be liable to pay compensation under the ‘Act Only Policy’.
Power to suspend an office-bearer of a Panchayat provided under Section 39 (1)(b) of the C.G, Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 is a valid piece of legislation. Provision of a State Act cannot be declared as ultra vires by comparing it with similar legislation of another State.
Revenue Court cannot grant injunction to stay alienation of property.
Section 10(1)(b)(i) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 is mandatory in nature.
High Court of Chhattisgarh
National Highway -130, Bodri Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 495220