Notification No. 5586/S&A Cell/2025 Bilaspur, dated 24th March 2025.
Regarding the cancellation of the written examination conducted on 23-03-2025 by the District and Sessions Court, Janjgir-Champa.
Order No. 250/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 22nd March 2025.
Endt No. 248/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 22nd March 2025.
Order No. 234/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 21st March 2025.
Order No. 236/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 21st March 2025.
Endt No. 238/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 21st March 2025.
Endt No. 239/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 21st March 2025.
Endt No. 240/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 21st March 2025.
Endt No. 241/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 21st March 2025.
Endt No. 242/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 21st March 2025.
Order No. 230/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 20th March 2025.
Corrigendum (Order No. 208/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 19th March 2025.)
Information letter No. 5101/ Bilaspur, dated 18th March 2025.(Regarding allotment of F-type government residential house of High Court Colony, Rahangi)
Order No. 208/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 19th March 2025.
Order No. 210/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 19th March 2025.
Order No. 212/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 19th March 2025.
Order No. 214/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 19th March 2025.
Order No. 216 & 217/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 19th March 2025.
Order No. 219/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 19th March 2025.
Order No. 222/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 19th March 2025.
Order No. 224/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 19th March 2025.
Order No. 226/Confdl./ Bilaspur, dated 19th March 2025.
IMPORTANT NOTICE
Circular No. 17327 Bilaspur, dated 23rd October 2024.
Circular No. 181 Bilaspur, dated 17th October 2024.
Circular No. 123/D.E. Bilaspur, dated 17th October 2024.
Order No 135 Bilaspur, dated 21th August 2024.
Circular No. 609/confdl./2024 Bilaspur,dated 24rd June 2024.
When a child in conflict with law is tried as an adult for any serious offence
for which the sentence prescribed is life sentence, the same can very well
be awarded subject to the restraint that it may be awarded with possibility
of release, and not otherwise.
The offences under the Atrocities Act can only be attracted if it is
proved beyond reasonable doubt that the offence has been
committed on a member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe
community knowing that such person belongs to the said community.
The auction sale can be quashed if the auction proceeding smells the fraud and collusion.
A "related" witness, who may be naturally present at the
scene of the crime, his testimony should not be dismissed simply
because of his relationship to the victim and the Court must assess
the reliability, consistency, and coherence of his statement rather
than labelling him as untrustworthy.
Before awarding capital punishment, the Court has to strike
a balance between the aggravating and mitigating circumstances
viz. mental and emotional condition, age, possibility of
reformation and rehabilitation of the accused, brutality and the
manner in which the offence is committed, which makes the case
fall under the category of rarest of rare case and death penalty
would be the only appropriate and meaningful sentence.
In absence of any definitive evidence of ‘last seen’ and also the proximity of time
gap between last seen and recovery of dead body, the ‘last seen’ theory cannot be
invoked when there is no other corroborative evidence to shift the onus of the
accused under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Where there is two view possible, the view which is in favour of the accused,
should be taken into consideration.
According to the provisions of Section 7A of the Employees’ Provident Funds
and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, employees engaged by contractors for
loading/unloading, cannot be treated employees of the establishment, in the
absence of cogent evidence and an enquiry under Section 7A of the Act, 1952.
The Courts should be reluctant in interfering with contracts involving
technical issues as the Courts lack the necessary expertise to adjudicate
upon such issues. The approach of the Court is not to find fault with the
decision of the authority issuing tender, instead the Court should examine
as to whether the decision-making process was after complying with the
procedure contemplated under the tender conditions.
The inference of common object has to be drawn from various factors such as weapon used, their movement, the act of violence and the result, and the person who were the members of such unlawful assembly, all of them are vicariously liable for the act of such unlawful assembly irrespective of their individual act.
Trivial discrepancies would not made the evidence of eye witness unbelievable as mathematical niceties cannot be expected from a witness after
lapse of some time of the incident
Where there is plurality of Dying Declaration, each of them has to be separately assessed, and evaluated, and the one which is found to be voluntary, reliable, and made in fit
mental condition under the surrounding facts and circumstances of the case, it can be relied upon without any corroboration.
The report of the occurrence was dictated by the deceased
herself with respect to the transaction which resulted in her
death is admissible under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence
Act, 1972 as a Dying Declaration.
The Court can rely upon the testimony of a minor witness and
it can form the basis of conviction if the same is credible, truthful and
is corroborated by other evidence brought on record.
When considering the evidence of a victim subjected to a sexual
offence, the Court does not necessarily demand an almost
accurate account of the incident. Instead, the emphasis is on
allowing the victim to provide her version based on her
recollection of events, to the extent reasonably possible for her to
recollect.
If the totality of the circumstances appearing on the record of the
case discloses that the prosecutrix does not have a strong motive to
falsely involve the person charged, the Court should ordinarily have no
hesitation in accepting her evidence.
A conspiracy is always hatched in secrecy and it may be difficult to
adduce direct evidence of the same and the prosecution will often rely
on evidence of acts of various parties to infer that they were done in
reference to their common intention. The conspiracy can be
undoubtedly proved by such evidence direct or circumstantial.
The minimum qualification of B.Ed fixed by the NCTE under the National
Council for Teacher Education (Determination of Minimum Qualification for Persons to be recruited as an
Education Teacher and Physical Education Teacher in Pre-primary, Primary, Upper primary, Secondary, Senior
secondary or Intermediate schools or Colleges) Regulations, 2014 for recruitment of Teacher (Agriculture)
in Higher Secondary Schools, is prevailing over the Chhattisgarh School Education Service (Educational and
Administrative Cadre) Rules, 2019 and the State Government cannot dilute the said requisite qualification
of B.Ed for recruitment on the said post.
The non-compliance of Rule 10 and 11 of the NDPS Rules/Standing Order No.
1/89 issued by the Central Government and delay or deviation from Section 52-A of the NDPS Act, will not
by itself fatal to the case of prosecution if recovery and seizure of the contraband from the possession
of the accused is clearly established from other evidence in its cumulative effect.
If the Rules made for general good, causes hardship to an individual, the
same could not be a ground for striking down the said Rules.
The statutory authority is entitled to frame the statutory rules laying
down the terms and conditions of service as also the qualifications
essential for holding a particular post.
The confession given by one accused is not substantial
evidence against the other accused and can be used against the other
accused only when other evidence is available against the other
accused and the Court feels that the confession of crime should be
used to support the other evidence, only then the confession of crime
can be used against the other accused.
Once a dying declaration is found to be authentic inspiring
confidence of the Court, then the same can be relied upon and can be
the sole basis for conviction without any corroboration.
In case of serious doubt as to whether victim / deceased was in
fit state of mind to make dying declaration and in absence of certificate
of doctor, it would be unsafe to convict an accused on the basis of
dying declaration for offence under Section 302 of the IPC.
Application filed under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC should be
allowed if application indicates exceptional circumstances as
it is not a hollow formality.
Three ingredients are requires for the offence of Section 364-A I.P.C., one
is
kidnapping or abduction, second is threat of death coupled with the demand of
money and thirdly when the demand is not made, then causing death or hurt and if
all these three ingredients are available that will constitute the offence under Section
364-A of I.P.C. and in absence of any one of the mandatory conditions the accused
cannot be convicted.
Holder of an office ‘under pleasure of the Government’
could be removed at any time without notice, without
assigning cause and without there being a need for any
cause.
In cases of homicidal death, if both intent and knowledge
are present, the offence would fall under Section 304 Part-I of
the IPC, however, if the act is committed with knowledge but
without the intent to cause death or bodily injury likely to result
in death, it would be classified under Section 304 Part-II of IPC.
Retrospective seniority cannot be given to an employee from a date when he
was not even borne in the
cadre, nor can seniority be given with retrospective effect as that might adversely affect others.
While considering the mixture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic
substance for the purpose of determining whether it would constitute
“small quantity or commercial quantity”, not only the quantity of ‘offending
drug’ but the quantity of ‘neutral substance’ mixed should also be taken
into consideration.
The Evidence of a child witness is not required to be rejected per se, but
the court as a rule of prudence considers such evidence with close
scrutiny and only on being convinced about the quality thereof and
reliability can record conviction, based thereon.
The conviction can be based on testimony of the victim, who is a
minor, supported by other corroborative piece of evidence led by the
prosecution.
Ordinarily the Court should not interfere with the invocation or
encashment of a Bank guarantee so long as the invocation is in terms
of the Bank guarantee.
Delay, laches and acquiescence is an important factor which has to be borne
in
mind while deciding a claim especially when the claim is sought to be made
applicable with retrospective effect.
The power to remit a sentence considering gravity and nature of offence is
discretionary, but must stand
the scrutiny of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
A person shall have no locus standi to file a writ petition if he is not
personally affected by any
order/action or his fundamental rights invaded or violated.
A rape victim's prayer for termination of pregnancy
can be allowed because such pregnancy causes
grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant
woman, as she cannot be compelled to give birth to
a child of rapist.
Capital punishment can only be awarded in very exceptional and rarest
of the rare cases, which is lacking in present case, accordingly, death
sentence awarded to the appellant is commuted to imprisonment for life by
directing that the life sentence must extend to the imprisonment for
remainder of natural life of the appellant.
Ombudsman under the ‘MGNREG Act’ is amenable to RTI Act,2005.
Procedural defects and irregularities which are curable should not be allowed to defeat substantive
rights or to cause injustice.
Arbitral Tribunal is the master of evidence and the findings of fact which are arrived at by the
arbitrators on the basis of evidence on record are not to be scrutinized, as if the Court was sitting in
appeal.
The Rules cannot be declared ultra vires unless and until it is shown that
there is manifest
arbitrariness and it takes away any fundamental right enumerated in the Constitution of India. No
enactment can be struck down by just saying that it is arbitrary or unreasonable.
Chances of promotion can not be claimed as a right, only consideration for
promotion without discrimination may be claimed as a legal right.
LATEST NOTICE
