Latest 10 AFR Judgements with Case Note |
|
| 1 |
MEERA DEVI VS BANKELAL YADAV
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:20075]
Case Note : In a claim case filed under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923, the
purpose of wage determination under the said Act is to arrive at a realistic and
fair compensation and not to confine it artificially to outdated ceilings,
particularly when contemporaneous material indicates higher prevailing
wages.
Case No : MAC/1368/2019
Date of Judgement : 30.04.2026
|
| 2 |
PARASRAM GAYAKWAD VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18927-DB]
Case Note : A "related" witness, who is also an injured witness, who may be
naturally present at the scene of the crime, his testimony should not be
dismissed simply because of his relationship to the victim and the Court
must assess the reliability, consistency, and coherence of his statement
rather than labeling him as untrustworthy.
Case No : CRA/1978/2025
Date of Judgement : 24.04.2026
|
| 3 |
LAKHMURAM BAGHEL VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18373-DB]
Case Note : Where a DNA test has been conducted following due procedure, with
proper sampling and preservation, and there is no material to suggest
tempering, contamination, or procedural irregularities, the result thereof
carry significant evidentiary value and ought to be accepted. Mere
conjectures or unfounded doubts are insufficient to discard DNA test
findings. Court must accord due primacy to reliable scientific evidence
unless its credibility is substantially dented.
Case No : CRA/1057/2024
Date of Judgement : 22.04.2026
|
| 4 |
RAVINDRA KUMAR BARETH VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18364-DB]
Case Note : Where the prosecution fails to conclusively establish the minority
of the victim, the provisions of the POCSO Act may not be
attracted. However, if the evidence on record, particularly the
consistent and trustworthy testimony of the victim, duly
corroborated by medical evidence (MLC) and forensic science
laboratory (FSL) report indicating presence of seminal stains and
human sperm on the victim’s body and clothing, establishes that
she was abducted and subjected to sexual assault by multiple
accused acting in furtherance of a common intention, conviction
under Sections 366 and 376D IPC is fully sustainable. Absence of
injuries or a conclusive medical opinion does not negate the
offence, and each accused, being part of the group, is
constructively liable for the act of gang rape irrespective of
individual role.
Case No : CRA/281/2024
Date of Judgement : 22.04.2026
|
| 5 |
TUSHAR SAHU VS THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18260-DB]
Case Note : Properties acquired prior to the alleged offence are not automatically immune
from attachment under the PMLA. The definition of “proceeds of crime” under
Section 2(1)(u) includes not only tainted property but also its equivalent value,
reflecting a broad legislative intent. Where the actual proceeds are unavailable
or untraceable, authorities may attach other properties of equivalent value,
even if lawfully acquired or purchased earlier. Such attachment aims to prevent
offenders from retaining the economic benefits of crime.
Case No : MA/21/2026
Date of Judgement : 22.04.2026
|
| 6 |
SANTOSH KUMAR SAHU VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18098-DB]
Case Note : Testimony of the victim is vital, and unless compelling reasons exist
necessitating corroboration, the Court may safely act upon the
testimony of the victim of sexual assault alone to convict an accused
where it inspires confidence and is found to be reliable, particularly
when it is duly strengthened by corroborative medical evidence
indicating pregnancy during the relevant period and further supported
by DNA analysis of the child, lending scientific assurance to the
prosecution version.
Case No : CRA/1607/2025
Date of Judgement : 21.04.2026
|
| 7 |
HASDEO ARANYA BACHAO SANGHARSH SAMITI VS UNION OF INDIA
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18175-DB]
Case Note : Repeated or indirect attempts to reopen concluded issues through
collateral proceedings are impermissible and barred by the principles of
res judicata and finality
Case No : WA/313/2026
Date of Judgement : 21.04.2026
|
| 8 |
SMT. NIDHI SAO VS GREENEARTH INFRAVENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:17484]
Case Note : Article 137 of Limitation Act will not be applicable
to a complaint u/S 31(1) of Real Estate (Regulation
And Development) Act, 2016 filed before the Real
Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA).
Case No : MA/173/2023
Date of Judgement : 16.04.2026
|
| 9 |
BHAUSAB MADHUKAR GORE VS DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:17109-DB]
Case Note : Non-compliance with Section 52-A of the Narcotic Drugs And
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 does not automatically invalidate
the prosecution’s case. A conviction can still be sustained if the
evidence on record convincingly proves the recovery and possession of
contraband.
Case No : CRA/605/2025
Date of Judgement : 15.04.2026
|
| 10 |
DIPANKAR VISHWAS VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:17148-DB]
Case Note : The DNA report, being scientifically accurate, can be accepted as
sufficient proof of the involvement of the accused in the offence of rape
with the victim unless it is absolutely tainted for non-acceptance of the
same, particularly when the other circumstances, like injuries found on
the body of the victim and the FSL report regarding the presence of
semen in the vaginal slides of the victim, have duly corroborated the
allegation and are sufficient to base the conviction of the accused.
Case No : CRA/277/2024
Date of Judgement : 15.04.2026
|