Loading...

e-High Court Report (AFR)


Latest 10 AFR Judgements with Case Note

1
MEERA DEVI VS BANKELAL YADAV
Judge : Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:20075]
Case Note : In a claim case filed under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923, the purpose of wage determination under the said Act is to arrive at a realistic and fair compensation and not to confine it artificially to outdated ceilings, particularly when contemporaneous material indicates higher prevailing wages.
Case No : MAC/1368/2019
Date of Judgement : 30.04.2026
2
PARASRAM GAYAKWAD VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18927-DB]
Case Note : A "related" witness, who is also an injured witness, who may be naturally present at the scene of the crime, his testimony should not be dismissed simply because of his relationship to the victim and the Court must assess the reliability, consistency, and coherence of his statement rather than labeling him as untrustworthy.
Case No : CRA/1978/2025
Date of Judgement : 24.04.2026
3
LAKHMURAM BAGHEL VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18373-DB]
Case Note : Where a DNA test has been conducted following due procedure, with proper sampling and preservation, and there is no material to suggest tempering, contamination, or procedural irregularities, the result thereof carry significant evidentiary value and ought to be accepted. Mere conjectures or unfounded doubts are insufficient to discard DNA test findings. Court must accord due primacy to reliable scientific evidence unless its credibility is substantially dented.
Case No : CRA/1057/2024
Date of Judgement : 22.04.2026
4
RAVINDRA KUMAR BARETH VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18364-DB]
Case Note : Where the prosecution fails to conclusively establish the minority of the victim, the provisions of the POCSO Act may not be attracted. However, if the evidence on record, particularly the consistent and trustworthy testimony of the victim, duly corroborated by medical evidence (MLC) and forensic science laboratory (FSL) report indicating presence of seminal stains and human sperm on the victim’s body and clothing, establishes that she was abducted and subjected to sexual assault by multiple accused acting in furtherance of a common intention, conviction under Sections 366 and 376D IPC is fully sustainable. Absence of injuries or a conclusive medical opinion does not negate the offence, and each accused, being part of the group, is constructively liable for the act of gang rape irrespective of individual role.
Case No : CRA/281/2024
Date of Judgement : 22.04.2026
5
TUSHAR SAHU VS THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18260-DB]
Case Note : Properties acquired prior to the alleged offence are not automatically immune from attachment under the PMLA. The definition of “proceeds of crime” under Section 2(1)(u) includes not only tainted property but also its equivalent value, reflecting a broad legislative intent. Where the actual proceeds are unavailable or untraceable, authorities may attach other properties of equivalent value, even if lawfully acquired or purchased earlier. Such attachment aims to prevent offenders from retaining the economic benefits of crime.
Case No : MA/21/2026
Date of Judgement : 22.04.2026
6
SANTOSH KUMAR SAHU VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18098-DB]
Case Note : Testimony of the victim is vital, and unless compelling reasons exist necessitating corroboration, the Court may safely act upon the testimony of the victim of sexual assault alone to convict an accused where it inspires confidence and is found to be reliable, particularly when it is duly strengthened by corroborative medical evidence indicating pregnancy during the relevant period and further supported by DNA analysis of the child, lending scientific assurance to the prosecution version.
Case No : CRA/1607/2025
Date of Judgement : 21.04.2026
7
HASDEO ARANYA BACHAO SANGHARSH SAMITI VS UNION OF INDIA
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:18175-DB]
Case Note : Repeated or indirect attempts to reopen concluded issues through collateral proceedings are impermissible and barred by the principles of res judicata and finality
Case No : WA/313/2026
Date of Judgement : 21.04.2026
8
SMT. NIDHI SAO VS GREENEARTH INFRAVENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,
Judge : Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:17484]
Case Note : Article 137 of Limitation Act will not be applicable to a complaint u/S 31(1) of Real Estate (Regulation And Development) Act, 2016 filed before the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA).
Case No : MA/173/2023
Date of Judgement : 16.04.2026
9
BHAUSAB MADHUKAR GORE VS DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:17109-DB]
Case Note : Non-compliance with Section 52-A of the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 does not automatically invalidate the prosecution’s case. A conviction can still be sustained if the evidence on record convincingly proves the recovery and possession of contraband.
Case No : CRA/605/2025
Date of Judgement : 15.04.2026
10
DIPANKAR VISHWAS VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Neutral Citation : [2026:CGHC:17148-DB]
Case Note : The DNA report, being scientifically accurate, can be accepted as sufficient proof of the involvement of the accused in the offence of rape with the victim unless it is absolutely tainted for non-acceptance of the same, particularly when the other circumstances, like injuries found on the body of the victim and the FSL report regarding the presence of semen in the vaginal slides of the victim, have duly corroborated the allegation and are sufficient to base the conviction of the accused.
Case No : CRA/277/2024
Date of Judgement : 15.04.2026
Site is Designed and Maintained by High Court Computer Cell Bilaspur. (Disclaimer)
Hosted by National Informatics Centre (NIC), Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India.