Latest 10 AFR Judgements with Case Note |
|
| 1 |
JAWAHAR CHANDRA VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:54141-DB]
Case Note : In a case where the victim the raped and done to death, if the trial court finds overwhelming evidence of a sexual assault on the victim,it cannot ignore the commission of rape and convict the accused solely for the murder, the judgement must take note of and record the conviction for all offences established by the evidence, including sexual assault, along side the homicidal act.
Case No : CRA/143/2025
Date of Judgement : 06.11.2025
|
| 2 |
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH VS RAJANO and ORS.
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:53766-DB]
Case Note : An accused cannot be acquitted solely on the ground that the Doctor, who has conducted the postmortem, has not been examined by the prosecution, whereas as per Section 32(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, the postmortem report is admissible even without examination of the Doctor coupled with other corroborative evidence which strongly supports the case of prosecution.
Case No : ACQA/418/2010
Date of Judgement : 04.11.2025
|
| 3 |
Umashankar Purohit Dead Through Their Legal Representatives VS Chandrashekhar Purohit
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:52387]
Case Note : Plea of demurrer is a legitimate procedural tool to challenges the legal sufficiency of a claim at the outset, which is confined to pure questions of law apparent on the face of the pleadings.
Case No : FA/106/2016
Date of Judgement : 27.10.2025
|
| 4 |
DEEPAK KUMAR RATHORE VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:52155-DB]
Case Note : Basic ingredients of both the offences i.e. S. 302 and S. 304-B-IPCoperates in distinct spheres, each require appreciation of evidence from the p.respective relevant to the ingredients of the respective offence.
Case No : CRA/1530/2022
Date of Judgement : 27.10.2025
|
| 5 |
SURESH SARKAR @ CHHOTU VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:52156-DB]
Case Note : Scientific evidence, such as DNA profiling and fingerprint analysis can reliably establish the identity of an accused and link them to a crime when corroborated with circumstantial evidence , it help from complete chain of circumstances, supporting conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
Case No : CRA/1584/2022
Date of Judgement : 27.10.2025
|
| 6 |
Rajendra Prasad Mishra VS State Of Chhattisgarh
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:51196]
Case Note : Same treatment is required to be given to defence witness(es) as is to be given ton the prosecution witness(es).
Case No : CRA/1267/2016
Date of Judgement : 14.10.2025
|
| 7 |
SHANI KUMAR CHAUHAN VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:50427-DB]
Case Note : An accused cannot claim benefit of minor inconsistencies in the victim's statement when medical and forensic evidence corroborate the prosecution's case, particularly where the victim's version has remained consistent throughout and inspires confidence and her evidence falls under the category of sterling witness.
Case No : CRA/550/2023
Date of Judgement : 09.10.2025
|
| 8 |
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH VS DEEPAK PHABYANI
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:50318-DB]
Case Note : the scope of interference in an appeal against acquittal is very limited Unless it is found that the view taken by the Court is impossible or perverse, it is not permissible to interfere with the finding of acquittal .
Case No : ACQA/456/2010
Date of Judgement : 09.10.2025
|
| 9 |
Anil Khandelwal VS State Of Chhattisgarh
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:50045-DB]
Case Note : the evidence of injured witness cannot ordinarily be doubted on account of minor contradictions and conviction can be based upon such evidence subject to corroboration with other incrimination factors coupled with recoveries.
Case No : ACQA/84/2016
Date of Judgement : 08.10.2025
|
| 10 |
SHREE CEMENT LIMITED VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:49973-DB]
Case Note : A taxing statute must be interpreted strictly and in its literal sense. Nothing can be added or subtracted from the language employed by the legislature so as to impose tax by implication or inference.
Case No : WPT/263/2023
Date of Judgement : 08.10.2025
|