Loading...

e-High Court Report (AFR)


Latest 10 AFR Judgements with Case Note

1
SHANI KUMAR CHAUHAN VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:50427-DB]
Case Note : An accused cannot claim benefit of minor inconsistencies in the victim's statement when medical and forensic evidence corroborate the prosecution's case, particularly where the victim's version has remained consistent throughout and inspires confidence and her evidence falls under the category of sterling witness.
Case No : CRA/550/2023
Date of Judgement : 09.10.2025
2
Shailesh Kushwaha VS State Of Chhattisgarh
Judge : Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:48838]
Case Note : To convict an accused for an offence under Section 306 IPC, it is not sufficient to show that the deceased was subjected to the harassment or humiliation. The prosecution must establish that there was a proximate act of instigation, intentional aid, or conspiracy on the part of the accused which directly lled to the suicide.
Case No : CRA/1107/2016
Date of Judgement : 23.09.2025
3
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH VS M/S ANJANI STEELS LIMITED
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:47984-DB]
Case Note : Scope of intervention of the court in arbitral matters is virtually prohibited, of not absolutely barred and that the interference is confined only to the extent envisage under Section 34 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act,1996.
Case No : ARBA/11/2020
Date of Judgement : 18.09.2025
4
Dr. Shashikala Kosam VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:46690-DB]
Case Note : The power of relaxation Rule 22 of the Chhattisgarh Medical Education (Gazetted) Services and Service Conditions of Directorate Health Services Health and family welfare Department, known as Chhattisgarh Medical Education (Gazetted) Services Recruitment Rules 2013 is confined to conditions of service and cannot override or amend a substantive recruitment provision. An executive notification cannot defeat a statutory mandate requiring 100/ promotion.
Case No : WPS/93/2022
Date of Judgement : 12.09.2025
5
BRANCH MANAGER, SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. VS MOHAN KANHAI
Judge : Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:46246]
Case Note : " If a vehicle is duly insured and there is no branch of the insurance policy, the insurer remain liable to pay compensation , even if the registration has not been transferred to the subsequent purchaser who was in possession and control of the offending vehicle."
Case No : MAC/354/2018
Date of Judgement : 10.09.2025
6
JUVENILE CONFLICTED WITH LAW VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:46127-DB]
Case Note : Under the provision of the Juvenile Justice ( Care and protection of children ) Act 2015, particularly Section 15 and 18 a child who commits a heinous offence and is found fit for trial can be Sentenced to a maximum period of three years in a place of safty.
Case No : CRA/321/2024
Date of Judgement : 10.09.2025
7
HOLLY CROSS HIGHER SEC. SCH. PEN.BADA VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ANOTHER
Judge : Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey, Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:46051-DB]
Case Note : "An educational Institution can also be reqarded as an 'Establishment' under the Employees State Insurance ACT, 1948 (ES) ACT. as it provides services and activities that are systematically and habitually undertaken to serve the community with the assistance of its employees"
Case No : WPC/524/2009
Date of Judgement : 10.09.2025
8
ADARSH VIDYALAY VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey, Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:46065-DB]
Case Note : " An educational institution qualifies as an establishment under the employees' State insurance Act 1948(ESI Act ) because it provides services and activities to the public at large regularly with the help and support of its employees"
Case No : WPL/1327/2011
Date of Judgement : 10.09.2025
9
Pankaj Ram VS State Of Chhattisgarh
Judge : Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:45637]
Case Note : For conviction U/S 368 IPC, the prosecution is required to prove that the accused had knowledge that the person concerned had been kidnapped or abducted.
Case No : CRA/288/2016
Date of Judgement : 08.09.2025
10
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VS AGRAWAL INFRABUILD PVT. LTD,
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:45211-DB]
Case Note : If the Assessee is not able to provide a satisfactory explanation of the nature and source of the investment made, it is open to the Revenue to hold that it is the income of the Assessee and there would be no further burden on the Revenue t6o show that the income is from any Particular source.
Case No : TAXC/167/2023
Date of Judgement : 04.09.2025
Site is Designed and Maintained by High Court Computer Cell Bilaspur. (Disclaimer)
Hosted by National Informatics Centre (NIC), Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India.