National emblem

High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Latest 10 AFR Judgements with Case Note

1
DR. K. V. K. RAO VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [HINDI]
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:21273-DB]
Case Note : " When there is a comprehensive remedy of arbitration clause under the Regulation. a case which is civil dispute cannot be converted into a criminal dispute, it would be an abuse of the process of law".
Case No : CRMP/402/2022
Date of Judgement : 08.05.2025
2
MANOJ KUMAR VS RAM MILAN SINGH
Judge : Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:20147]
Case Note : 1. In motor accident claim cases, even the major, married and earning sons or daughter for( or other legal heirs) of the deceased have right to apply for compensation and the Tribunal must consider their cases despite they being fully dependent on the deceased. 2. Pension / family pension ought not to be deducted while working ought the loss of dependency and the compensation to be granted to the claimants.
Case No : MAC/1961/2019
Date of Judgement : 02.05.2025
3
RITESH @ PAPPU MANJHI VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:20172-DB]
Case Note : Testimony of the victim is vital and unless there are compelling reasons which necessitate looking for corroboration of her statement, the court should find no difficulty to act on the Testimony of the victim of sexual assault alone to convict an accused where her testimony inspires confidence and is found to be reliable.
Case No : CRA/310/2024
Date of Judgement : 02.05.2025
4
VINEET KUMAR VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:20188-DB]
Case Note : Conviction can very well be based on the unrebutted and consistent evidence of corrosecutrux by other evidence.
Case No : CRA/102/2024
Date of Judgement : 02.05.2025
5
KUMARI MEGHA GOYAL VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:20054-DB]
Case Note : The custody under section 27 of the Evidence Act is not only restricted to formal custody and includes any kind of restriction restrain and even surveillance by the police. In cases of the circumstantial evidence the Court are called upon to make in ferences from the available evidence, which may lead to guilt of accused.
Case No : CRA/145/2021
Date of Judgement : 01.05.2025
6
CHANESHWARI SAHU VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:19047-DB]
Case Note : Testimony of the child witness has to be carefully scrutinised before the same believed by the Court and if the Court finds it to be reliable, trustworthy and truthful , then the same would not be discarded on the mere premise that the witness happens to be a child witness and once the tetimony of the child witness is corroborated by other evidences on record, then the same would be admissible.
Case No : CRA/1374/2024
Date of Judgement : 28.04.2025
7
SMT. NASEEMA ALI VS SMT. SAKEELA PARVEEN
Judge : Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:18836]
Case Note : Order Rule 1 CPC Speedy Justice timely justice and timely delivery of justice are legal right of a litigant. Court can grant time and adjournthe hearing of a case if sufficient cause is shown but it is limited to maximum of threee times.
Case No : WP227/375/2025
Date of Judgement : 25.04.2025
8
ABHINAY DAS MANIKPURI VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:18944]
Case Note : Compassionate appointment is a concession not a right Once accepted,no claim for change or up gradation of post is permissible. Judicial review in such matters is limited.
Case No : WPS/6349/2018
Date of Judgement : 25.04.2025
9
AKASH KOSARE VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:18151-DB]
Case Note : In a case of murder, Conviction should be based in such evidence which is admissible in the Court and this should be done on the basis of direct and and circumstantial evidence even in the event of non recovery of the dead body.
Case No : CRA/335/2021
Date of Judgement : 22.04.2025
10
RAM PRASAD NAYAK VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:17141]
Case Note : " Employee involved himself in a crime but acquitted later is not entitled to back wages, as he had disabled himself for rendering the service on account of conviction or incarceration in jail.
Case No : WPS/1473/2021
Date of Judgement : 15.04.2025