National emblem

High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Latest 10 AFR Judgements with Case Note

1
AJAY VERMA @ CHHOTU VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:31864-DB]
Case Note : Were a Victim is raped by one more persons forming a group or acting in furtherance of a common intention , each member of such group shall be deemed ton have a committed the offence of rape, in accordance with the principles of joint liability and common intention as defined under the applicable laws.
Case No : CRA/390/2021
Date of Judgement : 10.07.2025
2
ARVIND KUMAR VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:30088-DB]
Case Note : Any eligibility criteria must bear a reasonable corelation with the with the functional recruitment of the post, the nature of the duties to be performed and the aptitudes necessary to fulfill those duties effectively.
Case No : WPS/1983/2025
Date of Judgement : 03.07.2025
3
Shri Vindhyavasini Maa Bilaimata Pujari Parishad Committee VS Vindhyavasini Mandir Trust Samiti
Judge : Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:29861]
Case Note : The pujari is only a grantee to manage the property of the deity and such grant can be reassumed if the pujari fails to do the task assigned to him i.e. to offer prayers. He cannot be thus treated as a Bhumiswami.
Case No : WP227/58/2016
Date of Judgement : 02.07.2025
4
AJAY PANDEY VS UNION OF INDIA
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:26255-DB]
Case Note : In case organized cime, where a ciminal conspiracy is hatched for the transportation of substantial quanitity of contraband, and the same is established through clinching evidence, failure on the part of the accused to provide explanation would prove fatal to their defence.
Case No : CRA/2234/2023
Date of Judgement : 20.06.2025
5
SANT KUMAR VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:25748-DB]
Case Note : Testimony of an injured eye witnesses carries significant evidentiary value, Such testimony cannot be dismissed as unreliable unless there are substantial discrepancies or contradiction that undermine their credibility.
Case No : CRA/1950/2024
Date of Judgement : 19.06.2025
6
RAJEEV KUMAR SAHU, VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:24675]
Case Note : A consensual relationship turning sour partners becoming distant cannot only burdens the court, but blots the identify of an individual of such a heinous offence.
Case No : CRR/552/2021
Date of Judgement : 16.06.2025
7
MOHAMMED SIRAZ VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [HINDI]
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:24228-DB]
Case Note : Mere suspicion is not enough to prosecute the accused for offence punishable under Section 370 of the IPC for human trafficking in absence of congent evidence in relation of exploitation
Case No : CRA/2176/2024
Date of Judgement : 16.06.2025
8
PANKU KASHYAP VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:23000-DB]
Case Note : Any act sexual assault harassment to the children should be viewed very seriously and all such offences of sexual assault, sexual harassment on the children have to be dealt with in a stringent manner and no leniency should be shown to a person who has committed the offence under the POCSO Act.
Case No : CRA/984/2021
Date of Judgement : 11.06.2025
9
IN REFERANCE OF STATE OF CHHATTISGARH VS SANTRAM MANJHWAR [HINDI]
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:22996-DB]
Case Note : Rather5 than applying strict classification of the type of offence that warrant death Sentence, the court must focus on considering the aggravating and mitigating circumstances and arrive at individualished sentencing outcome on case to case basis.
Case No : CRREF/1/2025
Date of Judgement : 11.06.2025
10
ABDUL SHAHEED VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Judge : Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha, Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Neutral Citation : [2025:CGHC:22807-DB]
Case Note : Testimony of witness,' which is of high quality on caliber can be accepted without requiring additional corroboration .
Case No : CRA/16/2021
Date of Judgement : 10.06.2025