Welcome to the Official Website of the High Court of Chhattisgarh

Image of High Court of Chhattisgarh

High Court of Chhattisgarh

Image of High Court of Chhattisgarh

Juvenile Justice

Grievances / Complaints

MIG Legal Aid Society

Display Court View

हिन्दी

Important Notice

Order No. 41, Bilaspur Dated 29^rd June, 2019. PDF

Admit card for the post of Translator for High Court Of Chhattisgarh & SLSA Bilaspur. HTML

Order no. 99 dated 19^th December, 2018. PDF

Tender Notice No. 9595-A & 9595-B/CPC/2019 Bilaspur, 06^th September, 2019. HTML

Transfer Guidelines/Policy Of The High Court Of Chhattisgarh - 2013. HTML

Notification No.9040/Rules/2019, Bilaspur Dated 29^th August, 2019. PDF

Amendment Order No. 8818/Checker/2019, Bilaspur Dated 23^th August, 2019. PDF

Latest AFR

Executive order cannot curtail statutory tenure appointment.

Information supplied after statuary period of delay penalty of Rs.25000/- is imposed.

1.Finality of litigation cannot be on the basis of fraud as fraud virates all acts.
2.Court may add party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC at any stages as procedural sins should never be death of rights of parties.

When property purchased under the SARFAESI Act, the purchaser cannot be denied new electricity connection for dues of erswhile owner unless made known by bank.

The words "like manner to conduct the enquiry by the Chancellor" allows non-legislative admininstrative power delegation.

Acquittal appeal filed after enormous delay from the date of knowledge of judgement is not entertainable on the ground of unexplained delay and laches.

Punishment in Criminal Cases should be both punitive and reformative. The act of balancing is needed while sentencing a convict.

Death due to administration of poison not proved by producing FSL report. No proof either that poison was found in possession of accused and the same poison was administrated to deceased. Accused deserves to be acquitted.

Actual hearing U/s 3C(2) of National Highway Act 1956 is mandatory and is not meant for patch of work solution.

Sample finger prints of accused not taken before or under the order of a Magistrate of finger print expert against the accuesd cannot be read in evidence.

Wife making scandalous, vulgar and defamatory statement against father-in-law and alleging demand of dowry which she could not prove in the criminal case. Husband's prayer for divorce on the ground of mental cruelty deserves to be allowed.

When Rule do not permit, percentile of part of marks can't be rounded off.

Once the accused explains the facts within his exclusive knowledge,burden in terms of Section 106 of the Evidence Act shifts on the prosecution to prove from other evidence that it was the accuesd who committed the offence.

Information seeker under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act,2005, is not entitled for the copy of oath taken and subscribed by Hon'ble Judge of High Court.

e-Gate Pass

Other

Disclaimer : In case of any omission or discrepancy, information in the original records will be final.

Site is Designed and Maintained by High Court Computer Cell Bilaspur