Former Chief Justices
Important E-Mail ID
Grievances / Complaints
MIG Legal Aid Society
Display Court View
Notification No.12017/S&A Cell/2019, Bilaspur dated 11
Tender Notice no.11700 & 11699/CPC/2019, Bilaspur dated 23
Regarding direct recruitment to the 05 posts of District & Sessions Judge in the Kerla State Higher Judicial Service.
Admit Card for interview to the post of Translator in the establishment of CG High Court and CG State Legal Services Authority, Bilaspur.
Order No.1157/Confdl./2019 Bilaspur,dated 04
Following shall be the Roster of High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur from 14
Transfer Guidelines/Policy Of The High Court Of Chhattisgarh - 2013.
(upto June 2015)
Second wife of deceased employee of Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited (CSPGCL) is not entitled for family pension.
Misconduct for attending duties having consumed liqour has to be proved by medical examination of the delinquent and not by oral evidence.
The object to engage lawyer under section 36 (4) of industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to allow a level playing field to the parties.
Determination & extent of ward are to be based on population of principle of equal distribution.
Private property of a Ruler of Princely State merged with Govt. of India shall remain with him under the covenant/agreement executed at the time of accession.
The private properties would pass on to the next Ruler under the Agreement and under the principle of Lineal Male Primogeniture. It will not be treated as the Joint Family Property or HUF property of the Ruler.
Provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 shall not apply to the such private property by virtue of Section 5(ii) of the Act, 1956.
The Gaddi and the property of the Ruler would pass on to the next Ruler and thereafter to the legal heirs of the last Ruler. His brother having separated by providing Muafi Rights in 27 villages for maintenance.
After suspension of Kotwar, further course of enquiry will be governed by C.G. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal)Rules,1966
The patient admitted to hospital is for cure not for streched trauma.
Property granted by Government to a person would be the separate property of that person unless it is intended for the benefit of joint family.
Appeal by State against judgment of acquittal rendered by Magistrate for an offence, which is cognizable and no bailable, woul lie before the Session Court under Section 378(1)(a) of CrPC and not before the High Court.
Affidavit filed under Order 18 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is not evidence within the meaning of Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 unless the deponent is subjected to cross-examination.
In election petition, When there is no admission of factual facts-issues are required to be framed.
Executive order cannot curtail statutory tenure appointment.
Information supplied after statuary period of delay penalty of Rs.25000/- is imposed.
1.Finality of litigation cannot be on the basis of fraud as fraud virates all acts.
2.Court may add party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC at any stages as procedural sins should never be death of rights of parties.
When property purchased under the SARFAESI Act, the purchaser cannot be denied new electricity connection for dues of erswhile owner unless made known by bank.
The words "like manner to conduct the enquiry by the Chancellor" allows non-legislative admininstrative power delegation.
Acquittal appeal filed after enormous delay from the date of knowledge of judgement is not entertainable on the ground of unexplained delay and laches.
Punishment in Criminal Cases should be both punitive and reformative. The act of balancing is needed while sentencing a convict.
Death due to administration of poison not proved by producing FSL report. No proof either that poison was found in possession of accused and the same poison was administrated to deceased. Accused deserves to be acquitted.
Actual hearing U/s 3C(2) of National Highway Act 1956 is mandatory and is not meant for patch of work solution.
Sample finger prints of accused not taken before or under the order of a Magistrate of finger print expert against the accuesd cannot be read in evidence.
Wife making scandalous, vulgar and defamatory statement against father-in-law and alleging demand of dowry which she could not prove in the criminal case. Husband's prayer for divorce on the ground of mental cruelty deserves to be allowed.
When Rule do not permit, percentile of part of marks can't be rounded off.
Once the accused explains the facts within his exclusive knowledge,burden in terms of Section 106 of the Evidence Act shifts on the prosecution to prove from other evidence that it was the accuesd who committed the offence.
Information seeker under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act,2005, is not entitled for the copy of oath taken and subscribed by Hon'ble Judge of High Court.
Pre/Post Retiral Recruitment
: In case of any omission or discrepancy, information in the original records will be final.
Site is Designed and Maintained by High Court Computer Cell Bilaspur