Former Chief Justices
Important E-Mail ID
Grievances / Complaints
MIG Legal Aid Society
Display Court View
Notice dated 5
July, 2020 (Case already listed in Cause List for 06.07.2020 are hereby delisted).
Order No. 76(Mis.)/ Bilaspur Dated 5
July, 2020.(Regarding temporarily close the functioning of the High Court)
Notice regarding Lok Adalat scheduled to be organized on 11
July, 2020 (Saturday).
Memo. No. 3610/ Bilaspur Dated 07
March, 2020.(For grant of Additional time upto 15.01.2020 to join your duties to the post of Assistant Grade-III)
Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts of the Chhattisgarh State, Bilaspur Dated 27
Merit List, Select List & Waiting List to the post of Assistant Librarian & Library Assistant (A.G.-III).
Information of documents verification of the merit list candidates to the post of Assistant Programmer, Software Engineer, Hardware Engineer, Computer Programmer & Assistant Registrar (I.T.).
Circular No. 487/Confdl./2020 Bilaspur, Dated 25
June, 2020.(procedure for change in name of female Judicial Officers)
Notificaiton No. 5296/Checker/2020 Bilaspur, Dated 11
Order No. 63/2020 Bilaspur dated 07
Modification to the current roster dated 13
Tender No. 3527/CPC/2020 Bilaspur, Dated 06
(upto June 2015)
There is a clear distinction between the term "Resignation" and "Voluntary Retirement". The reasons in the application for voluntary retirement cannot be construed by the management of it being an application for resignation from service. The management/employer cannot give its own interpretation to an application for voluntary retirement by treating to be an application for resignation. The consequence and effect of the two terminology i.e. "Resignation" and "Voluntary Retirement" are entirely different and it has far-reaching effects also.
(i) The enquiry officer is required to give finding on evidence on the basis of which the charges were levelled and proved.
(ii) The enquiry officer is a quasi judicial authority and is not supposed to be a representative of the department/disciplinary authority/Government.
Election of each of the returned candidates has to be challenged by filing of a separate election petition.
The plaintiff cannot claim adverse possession on a Government land reserved for public utility such as road/hospital.
(i) The State would be employer within the definition of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for the teachers/employees of aided educational institutions.
(ii) There Cannot be unjustified classification between the two classes of teachers/employees for payment of gratuity before or after the cut-off date i.e., 01.04.2013, for whom, grant-in-aid is received by Institutions.
FCI being a body corporate is legal entity. It has neither living mind nor voice. So it can only act through resolution to transfer a land.
Advertisement cannot over-ride the service rules and cannot create a right in favour of the candidate for appointment.
SARFESI ACT 2002
* The said act shall not apply to creation of any security in any aircraft.
* Non-compliance of the statutory compliance as required under Section 3-A of the Act and 3-A of the Rules will vitiate all subsequent proceedings.
1) Furnishing of undertaking for recovery in service cannot be made an omnibus consent as ratio decidendi of facts and law would decide the course.
2) Recovery made after retirement from Government Servent otherwise with threat to stop pension, would demonstrate unequality of bargain power.
Ordinance not placed before the House of State Assembly within time loses its significance.
To ascertain whether for the vast land, the possession of the land is taken or not, a pragmatic approach has to be adopted and conduct of the parties would be relevant.
1) Omnibus statement of fraud on WILL, will not be sufficient in absence of specific particular as required under Order 6 Rule 4 of C.P.C.
2) Court would not return a finding of proof of WILL on assumed suspicion or supposition.
Death sentence awarded to accused for committing rape and murder of 5 1/2 years old girl is confirmed.
In view of Section 30 of the Evidence Act, self inculpatory memorandum statement of co-accused can be read in evidence if there are other corroborative evidence against the accused.
Prospective accused has no right of hearing before registration of FIR and investigation by the police officer or before the Court including the writ Court, therefore, in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into a cognizable offence, the prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party.
Pre/Post Retiral Recruitment
: In case of any omission or discrepancy, information in the original records will be final.
Site is Designed and Maintained by High Court Computer Cell Bilaspur